What Do You Think of Affluenza — the Criminal Defense of the Wealthy?

By on

What do you think about the affluenza defense — used when a wealthy person has been charged with a crime?

Not familiar with it? It was recently used in the case of a 16-year-old from a rich Texas family who admitted he was drunk when his pickup ran into four pedestrians and killed them. The judge earlier this month sentenced him to 10 years of probation, plus therapy, which his parents will pay for. The treatment facility in California reportedly costs more than $450,000 a year.

Here’s where affluenza comes in, says the Los Angeles Times:

Prosecutors had sought 20 years in prison. But the defense argued that therapy was more appropriate and put a psychologist on the stand who testified about affluenza, a condition, he said, that could afflict someone from a wealthy background from understanding that bad behavior has consequences.

The American Psychiatric Association does not recognize affluenza as a diagnosis, and many psychologists dispute that it exists as a mental health condition. Even psychologist G. Dick Miller, the expert witness for the defense who said the teen was suffering from affluenza, later told reporters that he regretted his choice of words.

I guess this means that only those who aren’t wealthy are responsible for their actions. Plenty of the non-rich have been sentenced to prison for killing people while driving drunk.

The case has prompted plenty of online comment. Wrote lawyer Scott Candoo in a snarky column in The News Tribune of Tacoma, Wash.:

Wow! Probation? Sweet! How does one get affluenza? Is it contagious? Can I buy it somewhere?

Next time I get stopped by a police officer, I’ll just act like Richie Rich, look down my nose at the officer, give him (or her) a condescending attitude, and with a slight English accent tell the officer my parents were rich and trained me to be like this, so “Just bugger off.”

Op-ed contributor James McAuley wrote in The New York Times that few seem outraged where the boy lives:
The disparity between the televised outrage over what was perhaps the cleverest legal argument since the “Twinkie defense” and the relative local indifference to the role of wealth in insulating the guilty from justice illuminates how much of North Texas itself has been constructed for the purpose of insulating wealth from any unpleasant reality. Why should criminal justice be any different?

Another issue is whether other rich kids will think their wealth insulates them from the consequences of their crimes.

Five lawsuits have been filed against the teen, his father and his father’s business as a result of the fatal crash, says the local NBC station.

What are your thoughts on the affluenza defense? Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments below or on our Facebook page.

Karen Datko contributed to this post.

Sign up for our free newsletter

Like this article? Sign up for our newsletter and we'll send you a regular digest of our newest stories, full of money saving tips and advice, free! We'll also email you a PDF of Stacy Johnson's "205 Ways to Save Money" as soon as you've subscribed. It's full of great tips that'll help you save a ton of extra cash. It doesn't cost a dime, so why wait? Click here to sign up now.

Check out our hottest deals!

We're always adding new deals and coupons that'll save you big bucks. See the deals to the right and hundreds more in our Deals section.

Click here to explore 980 more deals!

Comments & discussion

We welcome your opinions, but let’s keep it civil. Like many businesses, we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. In our case, that means those who communicate by name-calling, racism, using words designed to hurt others or generally acting like an uninformed bully. Also, comments that include links to email addresses or commercial websites typically aren't posted. This isn't a place to advertise your business.

  • Robert Eisman

    The rich should not be sheltered like this! How about this? Make a new law that everybody be required to have *lawyer liability*
    insurance in case of lawsuits or accidents? Works for ObamaCare! We don’t need our money anyway. Why not MORE federal mandatory mandates??

  • Charles Eppers

    If a person gets off for this affliction the parents need to be put on trial for the crime. If they are responsible for training their kids like that then they are responsible the crime committed.