Report: You’re Subsidizing CEOs’ Massive Pay

If you shake your head when hearing about multimillion-dollar pay packages for executives, you’re probably not going to be happy to hear that you as a taxpayer have helped subsidize that huge CEO pay.

It’s true. A new report by the left-leaning Institute for Policy Studies found that a tax loophole has allowed corporations “to deduct unlimited amounts from their income taxes for the cost of executive compensation — as long as the pay is in the form of stock options and other so-called ‘performance pay,’” the institute said.

In other words, the more a company pays its top executive in performance pay, the less the company has to pay in taxes.

This loophole has provided a massive subsidy for exorbitant executive compensation.

The report focuses specifically on the restaurant industry, and for good reason. The industry has proven to be a double burden for taxpayers. While restaurant workers are often paid so little that they are forced to rely on taxpayer-funded programs for the low-income, taxpayers are also unknowingly helping to subsidize millions in executive compensation.

At the same time, the National Restaurant Association is lobbying to block minimum wage increases.

According to CBS MoneyWatch:

The chief executives of the NRA’s 20 largest members take home more than $662 million in fully deductible “performance pay” over the past two years, which reduced their corporate tax bills by $232 million, the study found. Meanwhile, many low-paid workers at restaurants run by NRA members — such as McDonald’s and Chipotle — rely on government programs for services they can’t afford on their earnings.

A number of restaurant corporations are using tax subsidies to boost executive pay, CNN Money said. Here are a few of the heavy hitters.

  • Starbucks. The company gave CEO Howard Schultz a total of $236 million in performance pay for 2012 and 2013. “That translates into an $82 million taxpayer subsidy — enough to raise the pay for more than 30,000 baristas to $10.10 per hour for a year of full-time work,” the institute said.
  • McDonald’s. The fast-food chain dished out $34 million in CEO stock options in 2012 and 2013, which generated a taxpayer subsidy of $12 million.
  • Chipotle. Handing out nearly $200 million in performance pay to its CEO in 2012-2013 led to a $69 million tax break.
  • Yum! Brands (owner of Taco Bell, KFC and Pizza Hut). The company received a $23 million tax break after handing out $67 million in performance pay in the past couple of years.

How do you feel about subsidizing executives’ excessive performance pay? Share your thoughts below or on our Facebook page.

Sign up for our free newsletter

Like this article? Sign up for our newsletter and we'll send you a regular digest of our newest stories, full of money saving tips and advice, free! We'll also email you a PDF of Stacy Johnson's "205 Ways to Save Money" as soon as you've subscribed. It's full of great tips that'll help you save a ton of extra cash. It doesn't cost a dime, so why wait? Click here to sign up now.

Check out our hottest deals!

We're always adding new deals and coupons that'll save you big bucks. See the deals to the right and hundreds more in our Deals section.

Click here to explore 1,186 more deals!

Comments & discussion

We welcome your opinions, but let’s keep it civil. Like many businesses, we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. In our case, that means those who communicate by name-calling, racism, using words designed to hurt others or generally acting like an uninformed bully. Also, comments that include links to email addresses or commercial websites typically aren't posted. This isn't a place to advertise your business.

  • Nancy

    I see that several of these companies boosting exec pay depend on low minimum wage workers. They should be ashamed.

  • Joseph Freitas

    Well that doesn’t surprise me. If we didn’t let corps give unlimited money to lobby lawmakers all these scams wouldn’t happen.

  • tim machado

    And
    these are the very Millionaires who complain about people on welfare, their
    employees are on welfare. The rich are the largest welfare recipients; they receive
    subsidies and benefit from tax loopholes

  • Barbara Paige

    I’m ashamed of the disparity between the salaries between the CEO’S and the employees “working on the front lines”. All workers in this country need to learn and appreciate the concept of working together as a group and form unions. All managements in every company in this country use a very basic concept when dealing with all employees and it’s called “Divide and Conquer”. Most working people compete with each other and this type of behavior won’t help unless they change their attitude. Working people need to learn and appreciate the concept of unity (working together) in order to obtain their fair share of the profits of the companies. I’d like to see the company profits divided three ways: the workers, management and stockholders of the companies.