- The Most Expensive Mortgage Mistakes You Can Make
- Make an $8 Air Conditioner, and 4 More Hot Tips for Staying Cool
- The 11 Best Foods to Buy When You’re Broke
- 6 Tips to Avoid Becoming a Victim of ‘Food Fraud’
- Does This Budweiser Slogan Condone Date Rape?
- 10 Things We Spend Way Too Much On, and Cheaper Alternatives
What makes the most financial sense – buying or renting a home?
It’s a huge decision, with a number of factors to consider. The New York Times said:
In the country’s most expensive places, including New York, the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles, buying a home again looks like a perilous investment, based on the relationship between their prices and rents or incomes. And in a longer list of areas, including Boston, Miami and Washington, prices have risen enough that buying is no longer the bargain it looked to be a few years ago.
In an effort to help prospective renters and homebuyers analyze their options, the Times created a comprehensive new buy vs. rent calculator. The calculator factors in a number of homeownership and renting costs, as well as assumptions about how investment income and home values could potentially appreciate.
When I put in the numbers for my 2006 home purchase, the calculator suggested that if I stay in my home for just 15 years, I’d need to pay less than $1,262 a month in rent to make renting the better option. I’ve seen the rental options in my town. There’s no way that would ever happen for a comparable home.
Let’s say we run a similar scenario for a median-priced ($425,000) single-family home in Seattle. Using a 4.25 percent rate on a 30-year mortgage, the monthly rent break-even point is $1,493. According to Zillow, the median rent price in Seattle is $1,781 a month.
You can run different scenarios using the Times calculator here.
What is a better financial decision – buying or renting – where you live? Share your comments below or on our Facebook page.