Federal and State Government May Sue S&P Over Financial Crisis

What's Hot


How to Cut the Cable TV Cord in 2017Family

8 Major Freebies and Discounts You Get With Amazon PrimeSave

8 Creative Ways to Clear ClutterAround The House

Study: People Who Curse Are More HonestFamily

This Free Software Brings Old Laptops Back to LifeMore

Pay $2 and Get Unlimited Wendy’s Frosty Treats in 2017Family

Protecting Trump Will Cost Taxpayers $35 MillionFamily

The 3 Golden Rules of Lending to Friends and FamilyBorrow

6 Reasons Why Savers Are Sexier Than SpendersCredit & Debt

Resolutions 2017: Save More Money Using 5 Simple TricksCredit & Debt

Porta-Potties for Presidential Inauguration Cause a StinkFamily

Tax Hacks 2017: Don’t Miss These 16 Often-Overlooked Tax BreaksTaxes

5 New Year’s Resolutions That Will Pay Off 10 Years From NowCollege

Will there finally be some accountability for the meltdown now more than four years old?

A Wall Street Journal report says prosecutors are preparing to file lawsuits against the credit rating agency Standard and Poors, arguing S&P played an allegedly illegal role in the 2008 financial meltdown.

The charges are coming now because of a “breakdown” in private settlement talks after lengthy investigations, according to the article. It would be the first federal enforcement action against a credit-rating firm over the crisis. (That sure took a while, didn’t it?) Congress has been criticizing the agency and its rivals, Moody’s and Fitch, for years because they were supposedly giving subprime-mortgage assets too-good ratings.

There’s no word yet on why S&P was singled out, or any of the key details of the suit. (Although S&P was the first big credit agency to downgrade America’s debt, it’s presumably not a revenge thing.)   These probably won’t be available until it’s filed and prosecutors speak publicly. But we can get an idea of what this is about from a 2011 Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission report, which in part says this…

The mortgage-related securities at the heart of the crisis could not have been marketed and sold without [credit-rating agencies’] seal of approval. Investors relied on them, often blindly. In some cases, they were obligated to use them, or regulatory capital standards were hinged on them. This crisis could not have happened without the rating agencies.

We also have an idea of how S&P will argue the case: in the past, the firm has said its ratings are protected as free-speech opinions by the First Amendment. Sometimes that’s worked with judges, and sometimes it hasn’t. Time will tell what happens here.

Stacy Johnson

It's not the usual blah, blah, blah

I know... every site you visit wants you to subscribe to their newsletter. But our news and advice is actually worth reading! For 25 years, I've been making people richer without making their eyes glaze over. You'll be glad you did. I guarantee it!

💰🗣📰

Read Next: Trump Scraps FHA Rate Cut — What Does It Mean for You?

Check Out Our Hottest Deals!

We're always adding new deals and coupons that'll save you big bucks. See the deals to the right and hundreds more in our Deals section.

Click here to explore 1,751 more deals!