Feds: Banks Aren’t the Only Things That Could Crash Our Economy

What's Hot


How to Cut the Cable TV Cord in 2017Family

8 Major Freebies and Discounts You Get With Amazon PrimeSave

8 Creative Ways to Clear ClutterAround The House

Study: People Who Curse Are More HonestFamily

This Free Software Brings Old Laptops Back to LifeMore

Pay $2 and Get Unlimited Wendy’s Frosty Treats in 2017Family

The 3 Golden Rules of Lending to Friends and FamilyBorrow

6 Reasons Why Savers Are Sexier Than SpendersCredit & Debt

Resolutions 2017: Save More Money Using 5 Simple TricksCredit & Debt

Porta-Potties for Presidential Inauguration Cause a StinkFamily

Protecting Trump Will Cost Taxpayers $35 MillionFamily

7 New Year’s Resolutions to Make With Your KidsFamily

5 New Year’s Resolutions That Will Pay Off 10 Years From NowCollege

10 Tasty Alcohol-Free Drinks That Adults Will LoveFamily

10 Simple Money Moves to Make Before the New YearFamily

Could Your Pet Benefit From Marijuana-Laced Treats?Family

Regulators hope to expand government oversight to many nonbank financial risk-takers, including AIG, Prudential, and GE Capital.

Keeping an eye on big banks isn’t enough, government regulators say. If they get their way, federal authorities will soon have greater oversight of certain major insurers, hedge funds, mutual fund companies and private equity firms, The Associated Press says.

The Financial Stability Oversight Council is pitching a list of businesses it believes need to be watched more closely because their actions could have far-reaching effects on the economy.

The firms’ names haven’t been released yet because they have a month to challenge being labeled a potential financial threat. But AIG, Prudential, and GE Capital have already revealed their status on the list, AP says. None have yet said whether they will challenge the government’s designation.

AIG is probably the most obvious name on the list, because the insurer’s near collapse was part of what triggered the financial crisis in the first place, and taxpayers had to bail it out with $182 billion. That money has been repaid. (Although you may recall AIG had the gall to consider suing the government for bailing it out. It wisely decided not to.)

What does it mean for these companies to be labeled as potential financial risks? They “would have to increase their cushion against losses, limit their use of borrowed money and submit to inspections by Fed examiners,” AP says. They would fall under the Federal Reserve’s supervision.

“The council took another important step forward by exercising one of its principal authorities to protect taxpayers, reduce risk in the financial system and promote financial stability,” Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew said in a statement.

U.S. Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, accused the council of labeling the companies “too big to fail” and warned they could be creating a self-fulfilling prophecy by singling them out as more important than competitors.

Hensarling was an outspoken opponent of the financial reform law passed after the crisis, AP says. That’s the law that created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and many other consumer protections.

Stacy Johnson

It's not the usual blah, blah, blah

I know... every site you visit wants you to subscribe to their newsletter. But our news and advice is actually worth reading! For 25 years, I've been making people richer without making their eyes glaze over. You'll be glad you did. I guarantee it!

💰🗣📰

Read Next: Tax Hacks 2017: Don’t Miss These 16 Often-Overlooked Tax Breaks

Check Out Our Hottest Deals!

We're always adding new deals and coupons that'll save you big bucks. See the deals to the right and hundreds more in our Deals section.

Click here to explore 1,878 more deals!