How Much Did Medical Bills for 2 ‘Distressed Babies’ Cost AOL?

What's Hot

Do This or Your iPhone Bill May SkyrocketSave

23 Upgrades Under $50 to Make Your House Look AwesomeAround The House

Trump Worth $10 Billion Less Than If He’d Simply Invested in Index FundsBusiness

11 Places in the World Where You Can Afford to Retire in StyleMore

What You Need to Know for 2017 Obamacare EnrollmentFamily

8 Things Rich People Buy That Make Them Look DumbAround The House

32 of the Highest-Paid American SpeakersMake

Amazon Prime No Longer Pledges Free 2-Day Shipping on All ItemsMore

More Caffeine Means Less Dementia for WomenFamily

9 Tips to Ensure You’ll Have Enough to RetireFamily

30 Awesome Things to Do in RetirementCollege

5 Spots Where Retirees Can Live for Less Than $40,000Real Estate

10 Ways to Reduce Your Homeowner’s Insurance RatesFamily

10 Ways to Pull Together the Down Payment for a HomeCredit & Debt

Chew on This: The Story Behind Your Hershey’s Halloween TreatsBusiness

AOL's CEO backtracks and apologizes for insensitive comments about how much the newborns of two employees cost the company.

This post comes from Krystal Steinmetz. 

AOL chief executive Tim Armstrong reversed last week’s controversial decision to cut back the company’s 401(k) plan and apologized for blaming the medical bills of two employees’ “distressed babies” for a spike in health care costs.

Armstrong, who took home $12 million in pay in 2012 — four times his $3.2 million salary in 2011 — claimed that the two babies cost AOL $1 million each in 2012.

We had to wonder: How likely is that?

While AOL has declined to discuss its employee benefits, it’s likely that AOL, like many large companies, is self-insured and shoulders the brunt of its employees’ health care costs. Bloomberg says, “Self-funding means that an employer pays for health care rather than buying an insurance policy for their workers.”

Larry Levitt, senior vice president of the Kaiser Family Foundation, told MSNBC that self-insured companies typically have a “reinsurance” program to protect them from such catastrophic events. “With reinsurance, their liability for a high-cost case like a premature baby would likely be capped well below $1 million,” he said.

Levitt added that in the event AOL doesn’t have stop-loss coverage, acquiring such a protection plan would be a “logical first step in cost-reduction.”

The mother of one of the “distressed babies,” who penned a response to Armstrong’s insensitive comments on, said the cost of her child’s birth and neonatal care is not the issue. Deanna Fei wrote:

I have no expertise in health care costs, but I have a 3-inch-thick folder of hospital bills that range from a few dollars and cents to the high six figures. So even though it’s unlikely that AOL directly paid out those sums, I don’t take issue with Armstrong’s number.

She added:

I take issue with how he reduced my daughter to a “distressed baby” who cost the company too much money. How he blamed the saving of her life for his decision to scale back employee benefits. How he exposed the most searing experience of our lives, one that my husband and I still struggle to discuss with anyone but each other, for no other purpose than an absurd justification for corporate cost-cutting.

Armstrong made his controversial “distressed baby” remarks on the same day that AOL reported its best quarterly earnings in a decade.

What did you think about his remarks and his conduct? Share your thoughts below or on our Facebook page.

Stacy Johnson

It's not the usual blah, blah, blah

I know... every site you visit wants you to subscribe to their newsletter. But our news and advice is actually worth reading! For 25 years, I've been making people richer without making their eyes glaze over. You'll be glad you did. I guarantee it!


Read Next: 7 Ways to Save More at Big Lots

Check Out Our Hottest Deals!

We're always adding new deals and coupons that'll save you big bucks. See the deals to the right and hundreds more in our Deals section.

Click here to explore 1,739 more deals!