More States Ditch Family Caps on Welfare Assistance

What's Hot

The Most Sinful City in the U.S. Is … (Hint: It’s Not Vegas)Family

How a Mexican Tariff Will Boost the Cost of 6 Common PurchasesFamily

This Free Software Brings Old Laptops Back to LifeMore

How to Protect Yourself From the ‘Can You Hear Me?’ Phone ScamFamily

Report: Walmart to Begin Selling CarsCars

Where to Sell Your Stuff for Top DollarAround The House

Is Your TV Tracking You? Here’s How to Tell — and Prevent ItAround The House

11 Staging Tips to Help You Get Top Dollar When Selling Your HomeAround The House

8 Tuition-Free U.S. CollegesCollege

4 Car Insurers That Might Raise Rates Even When the Accident Wasn’t Your FaultCars

21 Restaurants Offering Free Food Right NowSaving Money

20 Simple Hacks to Make Your Stuff Last LongerAround The House

Trump Scraps FHA Rate Cut — What Does It Mean for You?Borrow

How to Invest If Trump Kills the ‘Fiduciary Rule’Grow

12 Surprising Ways to Wreck Your Credit ScoreBorrow

10 Overlooked Expenses That Ruin Your BudgetFamily

As many as 22 states once had family cap policies -- also known as "welfare queen" laws -- in place. Find out which states are repealing the family caps and why.

Welfare benefits are typically calculated based on family size. But in the late 1990s and early 2000s, 22 states enacted so-called “welfare queen” laws, which deny additional benefits to families who have additional children while on welfare.

The theory behind family welfare caps was that it would reduce birthrates among welfare recipients, discouraging a woman from becoming a “welfare queen,” a term suggesting a woman has more babies to get more money from the state.

Since the caps were enacted, research has revealed that denying women on assistance an increase in benefits if they have another child has no impact on births.

Research by the Urban Institute and a study published in the Harvard Journal of Law & Gender both found that family caps are harmful to children and their health, trapping them in poverty.

Now, a growing number of states have repealed their family cap rules. California ditched its family cap in June, making it the seventh state to repeal the contentious “welfare queen” law since 2002, PBS reports.

Other states that have scrapped their family caps include:

  • Illinois
  • Maryland
  • Minnesota
  • Nebraska
  • Oklahoma
  • Wyoming

California State Sen. Holly Mitchell, D-Los Angeles, worked for four years to repeal California’s family welfare grant cap.

“It is not the universal answer to poverty alleviation, but it is the most significant step we’ve taken of late to address the needs of those living in deep poverty across the state,” Mitchell told the Associated Press.

The California Department of Social Services says repealing the maximum family grant law benefits roughly 126,000 children in 93,000 families in the state.

NPR says lawmakers in New Jersey voted to repeal that state’s maximum family grant rule in June, but Republican Gov. Chris Christie vetoed the repeal. Christie noted that other New Jersey residents don’t “automatically receive higher incomes following the birth of a child.”

New Jersey capped its family payments in 1992. It was the first state to put a law in the books capping assistance, according to NPR.

What do you think of repealing so-called “welfare queen” laws? Share your comments below or on our Facebook page.

Stacy Johnson

It's not the usual blah, blah, blah

I know... every site you visit wants you to subscribe to their newsletter. But our news and advice is actually worth reading! For 25 years, I've been making people richer without making their eyes glaze over. You'll be glad you did. I guarantee it!


Read Next: 25 Ways to Spend Less on Food

Check Out Our Hottest Deals!

We're always adding new deals and coupons that'll save you big bucks. See the deals to the right and hundreds more in our Deals section.

Click here to explore 1,893 more deals!