New Labels Reveal Where Your Meat Was Born, Raised and Killed

What's Hot

23 Upgrades Under $50 to Make Your House Look AwesomeAround The House

Trump Worth $10 Billion Less Than If He’d Simply Invested in Index FundsBusiness

Do This or Your iPhone Bill May SkyrocketSave

11 Places in the World Where You Can Afford to Retire in StyleMore

19 Moves That Will Help You Retire Early and in StyleFamily

What You Need to Know for 2017 Obamacare EnrollmentFamily

8 Things Rich People Buy That Make Them Look DumbAround The House

50 Ways to Make a Fast $50 (or Lots More)Grow

32 of the Highest-Paid American SpeakersMake

The 35 Two-Year Colleges That Produce the Highest EarnersCollege

5 DIY Ways to Make Your Car Smell GreatCars

Amazon Prime No Longer Pledges Free 2-Day Shipping on All ItemsMore

More Caffeine Means Less Dementia for WomenFamily

7 Household Hacks That Save You CashAround The House

5 Reasons a Roth IRA Should Be Part of Your Retirement PlanGrow

30 Awesome Things to Do in RetirementCollege

Beware These 10 Retail Sales Tricks That Get You to Spend MoreMore

9 Tips to Ensure You’ll Have Enough to RetireFamily

New U.S. Department of Agriculture rules require more specific information on certain cuts of meat.

Meat cuts such as steaks and roasts will begin carrying a label that identifies where the animal was born, raised and slaughtered. Ground meat is excluded from the new regulations.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has required the country of origin to be listed on seafood since 2005 and meat since 2009, The Associated Press says. But now, rather than saying “Product of U.S. and Canada,” a package will offer more specifics about the animal’s life and death.

The new rules, which apply to beef and pork, have upset Canada and Mexico, which earlier had complained to the World Trade Organization that country-of-origin labeling, known as COOL, put their livestock at a disadvantage because of all the paperwork involved. The WTO agreed.

So, why does the new labeling require even more information? Explains The Washington Post:

By making the labeling more specific, the United States appears to be addressing
the WTO’s concern that the record keeping required under the previous rules was
too onerous given the meager amount of information it gave consumers. The new
rules, which cite more information, better justify the record keeping required,
at least according to the American view.

Some in the meat and grocery industries are also unhappy about the new rules, seeing extra expense and hassle but little added value for consumers. The rules could cost as much as $192 million to implement, according to USDA estimates.

The National Grocers Association, the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (the group behind “Beef, it’s what’s for dinner”) and meatpacker Cargill all voiced opposition.

Others support the changes, including farmers’ organizations, and consumer and environmental groups, AP says.

It may be a little while before you see the new labels. Companies are allowed to use up their old printed labels first.

Stacy Johnson

It's not the usual blah, blah, blah

I know... every site you visit wants you to subscribe to their newsletter. But our news and advice is actually worth reading! For 25 years, I've been making people richer without making their eyes glaze over. You'll be glad you did. I guarantee it!


Read Next: 9 Tips to Ensure You’ll Have Enough to Retire

Check Out Our Hottest Deals!

We're always adding new deals and coupons that'll save you big bucks. See the deals to the right and hundreds more in our Deals section.

Click here to explore 1,669 more deals!