Should Private Contractors Take Over Airport Security?

By on

Some members of Congress have threatened to privatize airport security if federal screeners don’t start treating travelers with more courtesy.

Privatizing government functions is usually a Republican battle cry. But even Democrats think Transportation Security Administration screeners aren’t very nice.

“When we mistreat [travelers] by barking orders at them as if they are cattle, not people, we actually diminish spirit of cooperation,” Rep. Gerald Connolly, D-Va., said, according to USA Today. “I’ve had it, and I think a lot of the public has had it. There is no excuse for it.”

How did we end up with the TSA? A little history, courtesy of The New York Times:

Airlines or airports used to have private security companies to screen passengers. But questions were raised in 2001, after the attacks of Sept. 11, and federal inquiries found that many private companies had hired untrained security guards. The TSA was established, taking over screening at all airports.

But airports were also allowed to opt out with TSA permission. Sixteen U.S. airports have private security, which is supervised by the TSA. The largest among them are San Francisco and Kansas City, Mo., while others are tiny.

A law passed in 2012 made it easier for airports to make the switch. Said the New York Daily News back then, “In recent years, however, the TSA has been hit with harsh criticism for intrusive searches and by tea party politicians who say it costs too much — especially now that the screeners are unionizing.”

But it’s far from certain that private security is better or saves money. One government study says it does and another study disputes that.

Says NPR, “And aviation analyst Robert Mann, a former airline executive, is dubious about returning to what he says was a fragmented system before the Sept. 11 attacks.”

What do you think? Would travelers and taxpayers be better off if the screeners worked for private companies?

Or does this bring to mind horror stories about private prisons, which don’t save taxpayers money, or the unbelievable amounts of taxpayer money spent to privatize the military? Are you among those who wonder why taxpayer money is being used to profit private companies for services the government normally provides?

What has been your experience with the TSA? Mine has been pleasant for the most part, and never awful. I enjoy one screener in particular who is always cheerful and funny, for instance, telling me I can keep my granola bar but that he will confiscate Twinkies.

Share your comments below or on our Facebook page.

Sign up for our free newsletter

Like this article? Sign up for our newsletter and we'll send you a regular digest of our newest stories, full of money saving tips and advice, free! We'll also email you a PDF of Stacy Johnson's "205 Ways to Save Money" as soon as you've subscribed. It's full of great tips that'll help you save a ton of extra cash. It doesn't cost a dime, so why wait? Click here to sign up now.

Check out our hottest deals!

We're always adding new deals and coupons that'll save you big bucks. See the deals to the right and hundreds more in our Deals section.

Click here to explore 1,265 more deals!

Comments & discussion

We welcome your opinions, but let’s keep it civil. Like many businesses, we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. In our case, that means those who communicate by name-calling, racism, using words designed to hurt others or generally acting like an uninformed bully. Also, comments that include links to email addresses or commercial websites typically aren't posted. This isn't a place to advertise your business.

  • http://www.moneytalksnews.com/ Stacy Johnson

    I’d say my experiences with airport screeners has been positive on the whole. Any chance the government can take over Comcast?

    • Falcon1963

      The only thing which will improve Comcast and the other cable and satellite services is large numbers of subscribers cancelling their contracts. I just wish there was an alternate for internet, we pay through the nose for that service. I don’t agree with the government taking over anything.

  • UncleParrothead

    I fly once or twice a year for pleasure and I would like to know why taxpayer money is used to fund the TSA? Why don’t airports and airlines cover the costs?

    • mimi

      Good question. It’s part of the Department of Homeland Security since 2003. Makes me wonder, tho, if the airlines’ fees were raised to cover some of that cost. BTW, we’ve always had the nicest courteous screeners. A thank you works!

  • mimi

    Privatize airport security? NO, definitely NO. Privatization does not work as they’re telling us. Our water company was privatized and we’re paying through the nose, often have low water pressure and to top it off, one of the 8-inch pipe sprung a leak and we’re without water for 12 hrs., then 6 hrs. It’s up again, but for how long. Privatization means “money in the owners’ pockets.”

  • Falcon1963

    I hate the concept of the TSA and the Department of Homeland Security, but that said, I think the service and abuse by agents was much worse when it was privatized prior to 9/11. Between 1976 and 2009 I traveled extensively world wide and only had worse abuse by security personal in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Now that I am retired I drive as I refuse to fly anywhere under 2000 miles just so I can avoid TSA. When the flight is greater than that I suck it up and put up with their “remove shoes, cross examinations, and occasional pat downs” crap. In a few weeks I am leaving for Australia for a month and I am buying most of what I need when I get there rather than having them going through my stuff and questioning me.

  • http://www.moneytalksnews.com/ Stacy Johnson

    That was a joke, Matt. I really don’t think the government should take over Comcast. They are the worst at customer service, however, IMHO.

    • Matt

      :-)