Bush Cut Compromise Hurts the Poor, Fattens the Rich

When President Obama announced his compromise with Republicans in extending the Bush-era tax cuts, he managed to anger pretty much everybody. He didn’t make any friends in the GOP when, in defending the compromise, he called Republicans “hostage-takers“. And many liberal democrats aren’t supporting the compromise because they feel he gave away too much: The compromise preserves lower taxes for couples making more than $250,000/year.

But the president insists that the compromise needs to go forward. In his words…

If Republicans truly believe we shouldn’t raise taxes on anyone while our economy is still recovering from the recession, then surely we shouldn’t cut taxes for wealthy people while letting them rise on parents and students and small businesses.

But here’s the problem: If the compromise moves forward as agreed, it will actually benefit the wealthy a lot more than it will the working poor.

That’s because the president’s proposal eliminates the Making Work Pay tax credit, which gave working couples earning less than $150,000 a credit of 6.2 percent of income, with a maximum of $800. (The credit was 6.2 percent because that’s how much is withheld for social security – that’s what it was designed to offset.)

So to get the maximum $800 credit, a couple only had to earn $12,900 (6.2% of $12,900 = $800.)

In it’s place, the compromise cuts the Social Security payroll tax for everyone from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent for 2011. Which means that a working couple earning $12,900 will save 2 percent of that, or $258. In order to get the same $800 benefit they did with Making Work Pay, a couple will have to earn $40,000: Any less and they’ll be worse off.

Now, what about the rich? A couple where each spouse is making $100,000 wouldn’t have qualified for Making Work Pay. But they will qualify to pay only 4.2 percent in Social Security rather than 6.2 percent – everyone does. Which means if each earns $100,000, they save $2,000 each, $4,000 total.

Bottom line? Couples earning less than $40,000/year would have been better off extending the Making Work Pay tax credit, which was scheduled to expire Dec. 31, 2010. Despite our president insisting his goal is to help the working poor at the expense of the wealthy, under the proposed compromise, upper income folks will be up to $4,000 better off next year.

What’s that expression about the rich getting richer?

Sign up for our free newsletter

Like this article? Sign up for our newsletter and we'll send you a regular digest of our newest stories, full of money saving tips and advice, free! We'll also email you a PDF of Stacy Johnson's "205 Ways to Save Money" as soon as you've subscribed. It's full of great tips that'll help you save a ton of extra cash. It doesn't cost a dime, so why wait? Click here to sign up now.

Check out our hottest deals!

We're always adding new deals and coupons that'll save you big bucks. See the deals to the right and hundreds more in our Deals section.

Click here to explore 1,005 more deals!

Comments & discussion

We welcome your opinions, but let’s keep it civil. Like many businesses, we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. In our case, that means those who communicate by name-calling, racism, using words designed to hurt others or generally acting like an uninformed bully. Also, comments that include links to email addresses or commercial websites typically aren't posted. This isn't a place to advertise your business.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Richard-Sanders/100000585679313 Richard Sanders

    thi is not true

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Richard-Sanders/100000585679313 Richard Sanders

    Billions for fake farmers and illeagels but no money for the job makers be careful while you are bent over there is a libreal about snatch your wallet and makr sure dont ever work again

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RNI3ULVB6X5TQIAYG5BWN3VSQ4 Michael

    Most of your articles are pretty good but this one is pretty cheesy. The Making Work pay credit was part of the stimulus and not a feature of the expiring tax cuts. With slow economic times I don’t think it is a good ideal to change anybodys taxes. Imagine that you owned a business and business is slow. Getting hit with more taxes might be an incentive to shut down the business and lay everyone off.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_P23AEKQFPKRBPTL5J6EGG4N5NQ Dayton Local

    Or atleast stop hiring people or start cutting hours etc….