Is Bank of America Breaking the Law With New Membership Fees?

What's Hot


5 Reasons to Shop for a Home in DecemberFamily

Shoppers Boycott Businesses Selling Trump-Branded ProductsBusiness

15 Things You Should Always Buy at a Dollar StoreMore

Giving Thanks: Why Foreigners Find America AmazingAround The House

New Email Phishing Scam Targets Amazon ShoppersMore

50 Best Gifts Under $25 for Everyone on Your ListFamily

Why Washing Your Turkey Can Make You IllFamily

Pay $2 and Get Unlimited Wendy’s Frosty Treats in 2017Family

The 7 Worst Things to Buy at a Dollar StoreMore

What the Richest 1 Percent Earns in Every StateFamily

10 Ways to Retire Earlier Than Friends on the Same SalaryGrow

The 10 Best Ways to Blow Your MoneyCredit & Debt

The 50 Hottest Toys of the Past 50 YearsFamily

30 Awesome Things to Do in RetirementCollege

The government has already closed a lot of loopholes in the Credit Card Act of 2009 that hurt consumers , but some banks – like Bank of America – still don't grasp the purpose of the credit card reform.

This guest post comes from Odysseas Papadimitriou, CEO of Card Hub.

Bank of America, while not exactly breaking the letter of the Credit Card Act of 2009, is certainly violating its spirit this year. While the Fed recently closed a lot of loopholes in the act – which banks used to extract more money from their customers – B of A keeps searching for new ones.

The $59 “membership fee”

Bank of America recently announced it would add a $59 “membership fee” to about 5 percent of its credit card accounts – using a mix of below-average FICO scores, “high credit utilization,” and poor payment history to decide who gets hit. While not illegal, this new fee breaks the intent of the CARD Act, which prevents credit card companies from increasing interest rates on existing balances until account holders are 60 days delinquent. Sure, this membership fee isn’t an interest rate increase, but it does arbitrarily hike the cost of credit card debt – which is exactly what the CARD Act is designed to prevent.

CARD Act intent

This rule was implemented to prevent credit card companies from trapping customers and forcing them to abide by terms that were not advertised. If Bank of America’s fees were to be applied to customers without debt, they wouldn’t be a problem because these customers could just close their accounts and switch companies.

But Bank of America’s risk-based re-pricing exploits a semantic loophole. Membership fees and interest rate increases are effectively the same thing when applied to indebted accounts. Both are finance charges, according to Regulation Z – Truth in Lending Act. While the membership fees will help Bank of America increase profits in the short term, this type of fee could hurt consumers in the long term.

Credit card industry must self-police

Bank of America needs to focus less on stop-gap revenue schemes and more on improving the underwriting practices of a credit card division that lost more money than that of any other major bank in 2009, the worst year of the Great Recession.

This is especially true if the company wants to truly compete with the most sophisticated issuers – such as Capital One, whose credit card division made more money than any of its major bank counterparts during 2009.

And regulatory agencies aren’t going to stand pat. They’re going to keep closing legal loopholes and stop deceptive practices as they arise. This is particularly true considering that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is scheduled to gain new authority in July, under the leadership of consumer advocate Elizabeth Warren. In a speech given at the Department of the Treasury in February – the one-year anniversary of the CARD Act – Warren spoke to the importance of continuing regulation…

As soon as the CARD Act became law, it seems that some industry lawyers were asked to find slightly different ways to accomplish that which the legislation was intended to outlaw. To its credit, the Federal Reserve Board responded with a rule-making proceeding designed to close the loopholes. I doubt that anyone thinks this is the last time such a rule-making proceeding will be required.

Ultimately, regulators aren’t going to turn their attention from credit card companies until these organizations prove they can police themselves. So Bank of America, for its own sake, should not proceed with its planned membership fees.

Stacy Johnson

It's not the usual blah, blah, blah

I know... every site you visit wants you to subscribe to their newsletter. But our news and advice is actually worth reading! For 25 years, I've been making people richer without making their eyes glaze over. You'll be glad you did. I guarantee it!

💰🗣📰

Read Next: 10 Strategies to Save Big Bucks on Amazon

Check Out Our Hottest Deals!

We're always adding new deals and coupons that'll save you big bucks. See the deals to the right and hundreds more in our Deals section.

Click here to explore 1,775 more deals!