Handful of Donors Have Huge Impact on 2016 Race

What's Hot

How to Cut the Cable TV Cord in 2017Family

8 Major Freebies and Discounts You Get With Amazon PrimeSave

8 Creative Ways to Clear ClutterAround The House

Study: People Who Curse Are More HonestFamily

This Free Software Brings Old Laptops Back to LifeMore

Pay $2 and Get Unlimited Wendy’s Frosty Treats in 2017Family

Protecting Trump Will Cost Taxpayers $35 MillionFamily

The 3 Golden Rules of Lending to Friends and FamilyBorrow

6 Reasons Why Savers Are Sexier Than SpendersCredit & Debt

Resolutions 2017: Save More Money Using 5 Simple TricksCredit & Debt

Porta-Potties for Presidential Inauguration Cause a StinkFamily

Tax Hacks 2017: Don’t Miss These 16 Often-Overlooked Tax BreaksTaxes

5 New Year’s Resolutions That Will Pay Off 10 Years From NowCollege

A relative few donors account for 50.9 percent of all direct presidential campaign donations so far. And big-name candidates in both parties are benefiting.

Only 3.7 percent of the donors who have contributed to the campaigns of 2016 presidential candidates so far have given more than $1,000.

But the donations of those 3.7 percent collectively account for 50.9 percent of all direct presidential campaign contributions so far.

That’s according to the U.S. Public Interest Research Group Education Fund, which issued a news release Monday. The nonprofit analyzed the latest quarterly campaign finance reports released by the Federal Election Commission.

The FEC is the federal agency responsible for administering and enforcing federal campaign finance laws, including collection and publication of campaign finance reports that candidates must disclose.

Dan Smith, democracy program director for the PIRG Education Fund, says elections should be about “big ideas, not big checks”:

“Candidates from both parties are relying on large donors to fund their campaign. Meanwhile, voters on both sides of the aisle are ready for reform. It’s time we start talking about solutions that put voters back in charge of our elections.”

The nonprofit’s analysis included the following candidates:

  • Jeb Bush
  • Ben Carson
  • Chris Christie
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Ted Cruz
  • Carly Fiorina
  • Lindsey Graham
  • Mike Huckabee
  • John Kasich
  • Martin O’Malley
  • Rand Paul
  • Marco Rubio
  • Bernie Sanders
  • Donald Trump

PIRG advocates the institution of a small-donor matching system for presidential races. Under this system, small campaign contributions would be matched 6-to-1 with limited public funds for candidates who agree to a lower contribution limit.

PIRG’s analysis shows that, with such a system in place, contributions from the top 3.7 percent on donors would account for 9.1 percent of direct campaign fundraising rather than 50.9 percent. Additionally, contributions from donors of $200 or less would account for more than 79 percent of direct fundraising.

Do you think federal campaign finance regulations need to be changed? How do you believe they should be updated? Sound off in our Forums. It’s the place where you can speak your mind, explore topics in-depth, and post questions and get answers.

Stacy Johnson

It's not the usual blah, blah, blah

I know... every site you visit wants you to subscribe to their newsletter. But our news and advice is actually worth reading! For 25 years, I've been making people richer without making their eyes glaze over. You'll be glad you did. I guarantee it!


Read Next: Who Are the Wealthiest Politicians in America?

Check Out Our Hottest Deals!

We're always adding new deals and coupons that'll save you big bucks. See the deals to the right and hundreds more in our Deals section.

Click here to explore 1,791 more deals!