The Restless Project: An Employer Can Force You to Stay at Work Without Pay

What's Hot

23 Upgrades Under $50 to Make Your House Look AwesomeAround The House

Trump Worth $10 Billion Less Than If He’d Simply Invested in Index FundsBusiness

Do This or Your iPhone Bill May SkyrocketSave

19 Moves That Will Help You Retire Early and in StyleFamily

11 Places in the World Where You Can Afford to Retire in StyleMore

What You Need to Know for 2017 Obamacare EnrollmentFamily

The 35 Two-Year Colleges That Produce the Highest EarnersCollege

5 DIY Ways to Make Your Car Smell GreatCars

8 Things Rich People Buy That Make Them Look DumbAround The House

50 Ways to Make a Fast $50 (or Lots More)Grow

32 of the Highest-Paid American SpeakersMake

Amazon Prime No Longer Pledges Free 2-Day Shipping on All ItemsMore

5 Reasons a Roth IRA Should Be Part of Your Retirement PlanGrow

More Caffeine Means Less Dementia for WomenFamily

7 Household Hacks That Save You CashAround The House

30 Awesome Things to Do in RetirementCollege

Beware These 10 Retail Sales Tricks That Get You to Spend MoreMore

A new, unanimous U.S. Supreme Court decision could have harmful consequences for American workers.

If you thought more hours with less pay is bad, what about more hours with no pay? Here’s another restlessHdr (1)reason you probably feel restless at night, a phenomenon I’m exploring in The Restless Project.

In case you had any doubt about how hostile America is to workers right now, the U.S. Supreme Court has cleared that up. Unanimously.

In a twisted ruling that only a corporation could love, the court this week ruled that Amazon (via its contractor) does not have to pay warehouse workers for the time they spend standing in line after work, waiting for a humiliating exam to see if they’ve stolen anything that day.

The Surpremes’ logic was based on the legal-heavy, common-sense-light notion that the screenings are not considered an essential part of the workers’ jobs. That sets it apart from, for example, detox showers taken by chemical plant workers after a shift.

The ruling ignores the most basic tenet of work: Workers should be paid for the time they are required to spend at work. If the time isn’t yours, it’s theirs. And you need to be paid for that. The ruling was UNANIMOUS in favor of saying it’s OK to require workers to spend time at work without pay. (Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan wrote a concurring opinion that hints they see limitations to the ruling. Still, they concurred.)

You should be scared about this ruling. Why?

“By not requiring pay for Amazon security wait, will [the Supreme Court] spur employers to brainstorm new ways not to pay wages?” New York Times labor reporter Steven Greenhouse tweeted.

Your boss now has permission to dream up tasks that would appear to a court to be nonessential to your job, and not pay you for them.

Check Out Our Hottest Deals!

We're always adding new deals and coupons that'll save you big bucks. See the deals to the right and hundreds more in our Deals section.

Click here to explore 1,712 more deals!