- You May Want to Retire in One of These States
- Is It OK to Use Your Smartphone While Dining in a Restaurant?
- Walmart Offers an Alternative to a Bank Checking Account
- Ask Stacy: The Millennials Are Ruining This Country. What Can We Do?
- Are In-Flight Mobile Phone Calls a Recipe for Disaster and Passenger Fights?
- There’s No Such Thing As Comfort Food
- 1 in 4 Jobs in the US Are Low-Paying
- Is Dental Insurance Worth the Cost?
Target shareholders reportedly complained that CEO Gregg Steinhafel’s pay was too high relative to the retailer’s less-than-stellar performance last year. The board of directors listened to them and cut his pay by 37 percent.
Bowing to the complaints, USA Today said the board slashed Steinhafel’s pay from $20.6 million in 2012 to $12.9 million last year. The news was contained in Target’s proxy this week.
The now ousted CEO will be required to pay back about $5.4 million in retirement benefits.
USA Today said:
In an era of increasingly large CEO pay packages, Target directors appear to have applied the company’s “expect more, pay less” consumer brand campaign to executive compensation. The board said it had “exercised negative discretion” last year, providing no short-term incentive awards to senior managers. While Steinhafel took the biggest hit, other execs, including interim CEO John Mulligan, saw compensation drop 10 percent to 16 percent.
In the fourth quarter of last year, which includes the crucial holiday shopping season, the company’s profit sank 46 percent over the previous year. For the fiscal year, Target’s profit was $1.97 billion, a substantial fall from just under $3 billion the year before.
USA Today says the former CEO’s golden parachute is worth more than $54 million.
What do you think about Target slashing its CEO pay? Share your thoughts below or on our Facebook page.