What Cable Mergers Might Mean for Your Television Service

By on

Have you heard?

The two most hated companies in America are trying to merge. That’s right. Comcast and Time Warner Cable are planning to combine forces and, presumably, lock out the competition so no other company can ever steal their coveted spot at the bottom of the American Customer Satisfaction Index. They’re seeking federal approval to do so.

They aren’t the only big names looking forward to merging either. The Department of Justice just green lighted an AT&T takeover of satellite TV provider DirecTV. While the Federal Communications Commission still needs to sign off, that deal is looking like it might be close to being inked.

Find the best price on everything you buy on our deals page!

With some of the biggest names in the industry set to merge, what have you got to look forward to other than longer hold times? Our crystal ball is hazy, but here are a few educated guesses.

Mergers may expand your service options, lower your rates and improve customer service

Don’t laugh. That’s what cable executives say will happen.

In his June testimony before the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson said combining with DirecTV will give his company greater ability to negotiate lower rates with programmers and also expand or enhance broadband services to at least 15 million mostly rural customers.

When it comes to customer service, Stephenson had this to say to the committee:

By combining complementary services and generating deep cost savings and operational synergies, the merger allows AT&T to price more competitively and to provide a higher quality experience. Customers will get a single bill and a single installation. They will have a single point of contact for placing orders, answering questions, and solving problems.

Mergers may increase your rates and reduce your options

Of course, not everyone is buying the idea that mergers will lower prices. At that same Senate committee hearing, Ross Lieberman, senior vice president of government affairs for the American Cable Association, said, “The proposed AT&T/DirecTV transaction will increase the incentive of DirectTV-affiliated programmers to charge higher prices to their rivals.”

Some mayors have similar concerns about the Comcast/Time Warner Cable merger. Both Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti and New York Mayor Bill de Blasio have submitted comments to the FCC questioning whether the merger would actually reduce costs and improve services.

De Blasio had this to say in his letter:

If the transaction is allowed to move forward, the company will assume control of an estimated 40 percent of the national broadband market and will become the provider to 30 percent of subscription television customers. This will consolidate in the newly merged entity inordinate influence with respect to key service features — most notably rates. With few alternatives available to consumers, the expanded Comcast will have incentives to drive rates further upward.

Meanwhile, Garcetti said a Time Warner Cable channel has effectively blocked other cable carriers in his city from airing Dodger baseball games, a move he said stifles competition and may mean higher customer rates. The LA mayor questions whether a Comcast merger would simply make these types of turf wars worse.

Mergers may mean fewer jobs for writers and less-interesting programs

Not only could cable mergers reduce your access to certain programming, they could also reduce the overall quality of TV shows. Fewer writers are finding work in the current market as it is.

Writers Guild of America West president Christopher Keyser said this in his Senate testimony:

In this consolidated market, independent programming has been all but eliminated. According to WGAW analysis of the broadcast network schedules, only 10 percent of the 2013 fall prime time lineup was independently produced. This is down from 76 percent independently produced in 1989. … In addition, most of the independent programs airing on broadcast television are reality series such as “Dancing With the Stars” and “American Idol.”

He added, “The proliferation of cable channels has not increased competition; the five companies which own broadcast networks also own most of the major basic cable networks.”

Mergers may make streaming movies an utter pain

Finally, some say cable mergers could make it more difficult to stream your favorite movies.

Netflix filed comments with the FCC in opposition to the Comcast/Time Warner Cable merger, saying Comcast already has a poor track record of allowing access to third-party streaming services.

In his letter to the FCC, de Blasio said Comcast hasn’t been too awesome when it comes to providing fast speeds to low-income customers. The mayor says Comcast points to its Internet Essentials service as part of its commitment to serving the public interest.

However, individuals signed up for the program are regulated to speeds of 5 Mbps (megabits per second) for downloads and 1 Mbps for uploads. For comparison, most people get faster service with their phone. Web publication SmartPlanet says Big Apple residents can get average download and upload speeds of 6.7 Mbps and 8.4 Mbps, respectively, with a 4G LTE device.

While the AT&T/DirecTV merger is looking like a done deal, the jury is still out on the Comcast/Time Warner Cable proposal. If you were the FCC, how would you rule? Do you side with the executives who say consumers will benefit or do you think the naysayers have it right?

Weigh in by leaving a comment below or on our Facebook page.

Sign up for our free newsletter

Like this article? Sign up for our newsletter and we'll send you a regular digest of our newest stories, full of money saving tips and advice, free! We'll also email you a PDF of Stacy Johnson's "205 Ways to Save Money" as soon as you've subscribed. It's full of great tips that'll help you save a ton of extra cash. It doesn't cost a dime, so why wait? Click here to sign up now.

Check out our hottest deals!

We're always adding new deals and coupons that'll save you big bucks. See the deals to the right and hundreds more in our Deals section.

Click here to explore 1,202 more deals!

Comments & discussion

We welcome your opinions, but let’s keep it civil. Like many businesses, we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. In our case, that means those who communicate by name-calling, racism, using words designed to hurt others or generally acting like an uninformed bully. Also, comments that include links to email addresses or commercial websites typically aren't posted. This isn't a place to advertise your business.

  • Super Man

    It is amazing how the mergers keep happening BUT we don’t want anyone to be anyone to be monopoly. Wasn’t AT&T broken up for that reason? Wasn’t new cable companies brought in because Comcast was a monopoly? Wander how much money is being spent on congressman to make this issue pass?
    On another note aren’t the cable TV providing trying to get rid of over the air free TV?

  • ManoaHi

    This is rather complicated, while I much rather have competition, I don’t think there is any now. The issue is “last mile” and that is the key. So as far as cost, there isn’t much incentive to lower prices. In our neighborhood, there is no Comcast, TWC has our “last mile” and thus can block anyone, or slap with high charges anyone who wants to “compete” with them in order to get access to the last mile to our house. So, right now, except for really big cities, there is no way to get them to compete for your account; thus, my statement that there is no competition now. Direct TV and possibly Dish are really the only competition, since they don’t have to deal with the last mile. In my city, the telephone company is trying to compete in the broadband and TV, so that is the only reason why TWC can’t immediately gouge us.

    It won’t be a monopoly since there is no real overlap between TWC and Comcast. That is why TWC and Comcast want to merge, but they will lock out anyone with aspirations to compete. A merger will hurt Netflix since TWC and Comcast have their own streaming service and without a clear enforceable net neutrality, such a merger should be banned until enforceable laws are ratified.

    • Don Lowery

      Actually…the satellite services aren’t competition either. Many apartment complexes refuse to allow their renters to install the dishes on their properties. Moved out of a complex several months ago which did this BS. Then years ago until the FCC ruled against them…HOA’s tried this BS in their fiefdoms. They lost that battle…but would try again if these mergers happen. The reason is that the HOA’s would get exclusive contracts like the apartments are doing.

  • grandmaguest

    I’m so glad I don’t have to fuss with cable or dish or direct tv. I have always had OTA and I hope and pray that the cable companies don’t manage to take them over. Keep free TV free! Sure I miss some of the cable (etc) programs, but you know what…a lot of the big ones that everybody talks about, I get to borrow from the public library. Yes, I have to wait until the end of the season, but then I get to do a “watch” marathon which is just fine with me!