Economists Give Presidential Candidates Failing Grades

What's Hot

How to Cut the Cable TV Cord in 2017Family

8 Major Freebies and Discounts You Get With Amazon PrimeSave

Study: People Who Curse Are More HonestFamily

8 Creative Ways to Clear ClutterAround The House

15 Things You Should Always Buy at a Dollar StoreMore

Pay $2 and Get Unlimited Wendy’s Frosty Treats in 2017Family

5 Reasons to Shop for a Home in DecemberFamily

This Free Software Brings Old Laptops Back to LifeMore

Should You Donate to Wreaths Across America? A Lesson in Charitable GivingAround The House

6 Reasons Why Savers Are Sexier Than SpendersCredit & Debt

Resolutions 2017: Save More Money Using 5 Simple TricksCredit & Debt

10 Free Things That Used to Cost MoneyAround The House

7 New Year’s Resolutions to Make With Your KidsFamily

10 Simple Money Moves to Make Before the New YearFamily

The 3 Golden Rules of Lending to Friends and FamilyBorrow

More than three-quarters of leading economists surveyed say the major candidates deserve either an F or a D for their discussions of economic issues.

Economic experts give mostly failing marks to the current contenders for the U.S. presidency — and their reasoning isn’t pretty.

As part of Bankrate’s latest quarterly Economic Indicator survey, the financial website asked leading economists what grade they would give to “the quality of the debate about economic issues during the current presidential campaign, and why.”

One dozen of the 20 responses were F’s. A few examples:

  • Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, succinctly explains his F: “There has been no debate about economic issues during the current presidential campaign.”
  • Bernard Baumohl, chief economist at the Economic Outlook Group, goes into more detail: “Trump’s policies are so vacuous, so lacking in detail and void of logic, they are virtually useless. Hillary Clinton’s proposals may be more substantive, but she has flip-flopped on issues as well, and is openly pandering to attract Bernie Sanders loyalists. Frankly, Trump and Clinton are the least desirable candidates for the presidency in recent history.”

The second-most-common grade was a D, dished out by five experts — who were hardly any less harsh in their explanations. For example:

  • Scott Anderson, chief economist at Bank of the West: “The candidates show little evidence of an understanding of economic theory or trade or immigration that would allow them to formulate policies that would help our country’s economic future.”
  • Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research: “There is almost no serious discussion of any economic issue. Trump and Sanders have tried to raise trade, and reporters have all screamed ‘protectionist’ rather than discuss the issue. There has been little serious discussion of Federal Reserve Board policy, labor policy, or the extent to which the financial sector poses a drag on the economy. This is in spite of the fact that at least one candidate has tried hard to raise these issues.”

Although the economists were not asked to grade Democrats and Republicans separately, one expert did anyway. He awarded an A to Democrats and a D to Republicans.

Seth Harris, a visiting scholar at the Cornell University School of Industrial and Labor Relations and counsel at the Dentons law firm, explains:

“Clinton and Sanders have taken on the big economic issues in the U.S. — income inequality, stagnant wages, trade, tax reform, infrastructure spending, financial services reform, education — although the solutions occasionally have been too glib, as you might expect in a political campaign. The Republicans have addressed few of the biggest issues and, when they have, their (particularly the presumptive nominee’s) ‘solutions’ have often been worse than the purported problems.”

One economist gave the candidates a C, and another gave an explanation but no grade.

So how would you grade the presidential candidates on economic issues? Sound off in our Forums. It’s the place where you can speak your mind, explore topics in-depth, and post questions and get answers.

Stacy Johnson

It's not the usual blah, blah, blah

I know... every site you visit wants you to subscribe to their newsletter. But our news and advice is actually worth reading! For 25 years, I've been making people richer without making their eyes glaze over. You'll be glad you did. I guarantee it!


Read Next: 2016 Election: 5 Who Win Under Trump; 5 Who Win Under Clinton

Check Out Our Hottest Deals!

We're always adding new deals and coupons that'll save you big bucks. See the deals to the right and hundreds more in our Deals section.

Click here to explore 1,825 more deals!