- You May Want to Retire in One of These States
- Is It OK to Use Your Smartphone While Dining in a Restaurant?
- Walmart Offers an Alternative to a Bank Checking Account
- Ask Stacy: The Millennials Are Ruining This Country. What Can We Do?
- Headlight Drama: Average Deer-Car Claim Cost Is Up 14 Percent
- Are In-Flight Mobile Phone Calls a Recipe for Disaster and Passenger Fights?
- There’s No Such Thing As Comfort Food
- 1 in 4 Jobs in the US Are Low-Paying
While some restaurant chains, including Papa John’s and Olive Garden, last year sputtered over the requirements of Obamacare, Starbucks’ response is: So?
“Other companies have announced that they won’t provide coverage for spouses; others are lobbying for the cut-off to be at 40 hours. But Starbucks will continue maintaining benefits for partners and won’t use the new law as excuse to cut benefits or lower benefits for its workers,” CEO Howard Schultz told Reuters.
The law requires large companies — meaning those with more than 50 employees — to offer health insurance to employees who work at least 30 hours a week. Businesses that weren’t already doing that have to figure out how to deal with the new expense, and some are choosing to do it by dodging the requirement altogether by shortening workers’ hours.
Meanwhile, UPS recently decided to drop health care coverage for some employee spouses, and blames Obamacare for the move.
That’s all despite the fact that the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected that health care reform would have a negligible effect on premiums for large employers, Kaiser Health News says.
Starbucks already provides health care to part-timers, and doesn’t plan to change that, Reuters says.