Is Streaming Really Better Than Cable? Here’s a Breakdown

Advertising Disclosure: When you buy something by clicking links on our site, we may earn a small commission, but it never affects the products or services we recommend.

Woman hypnotized by watching her TV
TheVisualsYouNeed / Shutterstock.com

Editor's Note: This story comes from CableTV.com.

Streaming TV is newer and shinier, but is it better than cable or satellite? All three services deliver live and on-demand television to your eyeballs, but there are subtle—and sharp—differences.

Cable TV and satellite TV have tons of channels and better video quality. But live TV streaming services are more affordable, flexible, and customizable, which makes them our winner.

Let’s dive into the nitty-gritty.

Cable vs. streaming TV pros and cons

Pile of cash money in front of a TV with several streaming service subscriptions
DANIEL CONSTANTE / Shutterstock.com

Cable and satellite TV:

  • Pro: Higher channel counts
  • Pro: Better video quality
  • Con: Requires contracts

Streaming TV:

  • Pro: More no-contract options
  • Pro: More customizable choices
  • Con: Limited channel lineups

Compare streaming, cable, and satellite

Smiling happy couple watching a movie or TV show on TV with home streaming service or cable while eating popcorn
Gorodenkoff / Shutterstock.com

We’ve reviewed and rated our favorite TV services at CableTV.com.

These are our editorial best overall picks in streaming, cable, and satellite by provider, tech type, editorial rating, price, and number of channels:

  • YouTube TV: Live TV streaming, 4.5/5, $72.99/mo., 100+
  • Netflix: On-demand streaming, 4.3/5, $6.99–$22.99/mo., most/best original content
  • Hulu + Live TV: Live TV streaming, on-demand streaming, 4.3/5, $76.99–$89.99/mo., 85+
  • Philo: Live TV streaming, on-demand streaming, 3.7/5, $25.00/mo., 70+
  • Fubo: Live TV streaming, on-demand streaming, 4.0/5, $74.99–$94.99/mo., 169–289+
  • SlingTV: Live TV streaming, on-demand streaming, 4.0/5, $40.00–$55.00/mo., 30–45+
  • Spectrum: Cable, 3.5/5, $59.99/mo., 150+
  • Xfinity: Cable, 3.5/5, $20.00–$80.00/mo., 10–185+
  • Cox: Cable, 3.9/5, $56.00–$139.00/mo., 190–290+
  • DISH: Satellite, 4.1/5, $92.99–$117.99/mo., 190–290+
  • Optimum: Cable, 3.7/5, $35.00–$125.00/mo., 50–420+
  • Sparklight: Cable, 3.3/5, $42.00–$121.75/mo., 20–100+

Data as of post date. Offers and availability may vary by location and are subject to change.

Cable vs. streaming: cost

Couple watching streaming service on smart TV
Pressmaster / Shutterstock.com

In the early days of live TV streaming, this was an easy one: Streaming is cheaper than cable.

But, with top services like YouTube TV and Hulu + Live TV regularly raising their rates, that price gap is closing. Side-by-side, though, live TV streaming still has the edge:

  • YouTube TV: $72.99/mo. (85+ channels)
  • Hulu + Live TV: $76.99–$89.99/mo. (70+ channels)
  • Philo: $25.00/mo. (60+ channels)
  • Fubo: $74.99–$94.99/mo. (111–166+ channels)
  • Sling TV: $40.00–$55.00/mo. (30–50+ channels)

Compare streaming costs and channel counts to cable

Couple watching TV
Lucky Business / Shutterstock.com
  • Spectrum: $49.99/mo. (125+ channels)
  • Xfinity: $49.99–$89.99/mo. (140–220+ channels)
  • Cox: $53.00–$138.00/mo. (75–140+ channels)
  • Optimum: $30.00–$115.00/mo. (50–420+ channels)

Not to leave out satellite TV:

  • DISH: $92.99–$117.99/mo. (190–290+ channels)
  • DIRECTV: $69.99–$159.99/mo. (75–150+)

Data as of post date. Offers and availability may vary by location and are subject to change.

Worth noting: Both cable and satellite providers will raise their monthly rates after one or two years of service while you’re still under contract (more on that in a minute).

Streaming TV providers’ rates also tend to go up year-over-year, but you’re free to drop those services at any time (read: no contracts).

  • Winner on cost: Streaming

Cable vs. streaming: contracts

Family watching TV
Africa Studio / Shutterstock.com

With the exception of live TV streaming service DIRECTV STREAM, no streaming provider locks you into an annual contract; month-by-month service and payment are still the rule for streaming TV.

Cable and satellite service, as mentioned previously, require a one- or two-year contract in most cases.

Some will nearly double their price after the first year of a two-year contract, which seems like a bait-and-switch even when it’s lined out in the fine print. (Always check the fine print.)

However, some cable and satellite services do offer no-contract options (like Xfinity), but they’re usually more expensive.

Streaming will likely reach this Hungry Hungry Hippos phase of in-your-face money grabs eventually, but right now it’s relatively transparent.

  • Winner on contracts: Streaming

Cable vs. streaming: channels

A hand holding a remote browsing cable alternatives
REDPIXEL.PL / Shutterstock.com

Only a couple of live TV streaming services have crossed the 100-channels threshold, while cable and satellite TV providers offer multiple plans featuring up to 200 or even 300 channels. They may not be extra channels you actually want (like home shopping and audio-only music networks), but cable and satellite easily win the quantity challenge.

Cable and satellite also beat streaming TV when it comes to sports channels.

It’s slowly catching up, but live TV streaming still doesn’t offer uniform distribution of sports channels across different services—there’s always at least one missing (like NBA TV on Hulu + Live TV, or NHL Network on YouTube TV, or any sports channels on Philo).

Sports channels on cable and satellite, on the other hand, are easy to get—even if it means subscribing to a more expensive plan.

But now that the NFL SUNDAY TICKET is moving to YouTube TV for the 2023 season, streaming TV may become the new go-to for sports content. For now, though, cable and satellite are your best bet for the most channels.

  • Winner on channels: Cable and Satellite

Cable vs. streaming: video quality

UKRAINE / Shutterstock.com

While on-demand streaming services like Netflix and Prime Video can reach 1080p HD and even 4K video quality, live TV streaming is mostly limited to 720p video quality.

If your internet service or Wi-Fi signal isn’t strong, it can be lower than that and even start—brace for the “b” word—buffering.

With few exceptions, like cable-to-source distances or dish vs. bad weather instances, live cable and satellite TV deliver consistently higher-quality 1080p and 4K picture definition.

The difference can be barely perceptible to non-pro TV viewers, but the distinction between 720p and 1080p tends to leave pixel perfectionists perturbed.

  • Winner on video quality: Cable and Satellite

Cable vs. streaming: choices

Three women friends watching TV
Tom Wang / Shutterstock.com

Streaming TV really shines when it comes to options: Cable or satellite service only offers one branded live TV option (with some add-ons for more money), whereas streaming TV gives you several live TV apps and services to choose from, and you can quit them at any time to try another.

Say, if you’re not impressed with Sling TV, you can bail and try YouTube TV, but you’re stuck with Xfinity’s TV service.

Streaming on-demand apps open a whole other universe of options. There are thousands of apps in thousands of genres in the Roku Channels store alone, many of which are free with no monthly charges.

With cable and satellite, you’re limited to the 50 to 300 channels in your package. Streaming is à-la-carte TV.

  • Winner on choices: Streaming

Which is better: streaming or cable?

Baby boomers laughing while watching TV
Anutr Yossundara / Shutterstock.com

Live TV streaming offers your favorite channels at more affordable prices than cable TV or satellite TV.

We recommend you get an internet plan with at least 25 Mbps internet speeds for streaming TV.

If you can’t get fast internet speeds where you live, you’re better off sticking with traditional cable TV or satellite TV.

They may be more expensive options, but they offer better video quality—and none of the buffering you’ll suffer trying to stream on slow internet.

Next, we’ll look at some cable vs. streaming TV FAQ.

Are streaming services better than cable?

Woman reading magazine and watching TV
Odua Images / Shutterstock.com

Yes, streaming services are better than cable, as long as your internet speeds are fast enough for streaming.

You can still watch all your favorite live channels while paying less than most traditional cable TV plans cost, especially once you factor in hidden cable TV fees.

Can streaming TV replace cable?

Young woman watching streaming TV
tommaso79 / Shutterstock.com

Yes, streaming TV can replace cable if you have a strong internet connection. You can get all your favorite live TV channels and on-demand shows with streaming TV.

What are the disadvantages of streaming TV?

Unhappy television viewer
Prostock-studio / Shutterstock.com
  • Slow or weak internet connections may lead to buffering issues.
  • Most live TV streaming is limited to 720p video quality.
  • Some live TV streaming services don’t offer local channels.
  • The prices of affordable on-demand streaming services can add up if you get too many.

Is streaming TV really cheaper than cable?

Couple watching TV
Prostock-studio / Shutterstock.com

Yes, streaming TV is usually cheaper than cable.

Even affordable cable plans, like Spectrum TV ($49.99/mo.), come with hidden broadcasting fees and equipment costs that add up to more than live TV streaming services like YouTube TV ($72.99/mo.).

Get smarter with your money!

Want the best money-news and tips to help you make more and spend less? Then sign up for the free Money Talks Newsletter to receive daily updates of personal finance news and advice, delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for our free newsletter today.