Money Talks News may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below. Our editorial team independently selects all products. Compensation does not influence our recommendations.
Kevin O’Leary has a number for you, and he wants you to feel it. The “Shark Tank” star says that by the time you hit 33 years old, you should have $100,000 saved (1). Miss it, in his telling, and you’re behind.
I’ve been investing for 45 years. I’ve watched compounding quietly turn small, steady savings into real money — and I’ve seen people give up entirely because someone on TV told them they’d already lost the race.
So let me be fair to O’Leary first: the math isn’t crazy. Save 20% of your paycheck, let it grow at 5% to 7% a year, and a median earner really can clear six figures in a decade (1). He’s also right about the thing underneath it — starting early is the single biggest edge in all of personal finance.
But here’s what his tidy number leaves out. The median 401(k) balance in America, across every age, is just $44,115 (2). The typical 20-to-24-year-old earns about $37,024 before taxes (1). Even the mainstream benchmarks can’t agree with him — Fidelity says aim for one year’s salary by 30 (4), a far cry from $100,000. And Americans nearing retirement, ages 55 to 64, sit at a median of around $185,000 (3) — not the millions these same pundits insist you’ll need.
Tell a 33-year-old with $12,000 that they’ve failed, and you don’t light a fire under them. You convince them to quit. That’s the trouble with O’Leary’s number, and here are five reasons it’s the wrong thing to chase.
1. A target almost nobody hits isn’t a goal — it’s a guilt trip
Start with the reality O’Leary skips. If the median American of any age has just $44,115 in their 401(k) (2), then a 33-year-old sitting well under $100,000 isn’t a cautionary tale. They’re normal.
Numbers like his are meant to shock you into action. In my experience, they do the opposite. A goal you’re told you’ve already blown doesn’t motivate — it demoralizes.
The real story of what people have saved at each age makes that plain. What matters at 33 isn’t the balance. It’s whether the engine’s running: money going in automatically, every payday, into something that grows.
2. He’s right about the engine — wrong about the gauge
Give O’Leary his due. The idea underneath his advice — save a fixed slice, let it compound for decades — is exactly right. It’s the closest thing to a sure path to wealth that exists.
But the number that matters isn’t a balance on a birthday. It’s your savings rate. Someone saving 15% to 20% consistently from their 20s wins the long game even if they’re “behind” his figure at 33.
O’Leary’s fix for finding that money is blunt: cut expenses to the bone — “lose the car, lose the cable,” even lose the cat (5). You don’t have to go that far.
Start with the money you’re already spending. For example, if you haven’t shopped your car insurance in a couple of years, you’re almost certainly overpaying — and that’s cash you can redirect straight into the compounding engine without giving up a thing.
Insurers count on you being too busy to shop around. But Insurify has fixed that. Unlike other sites that sell your data, Insurify lets you compare real-time quotes side-by-side without the spam.
It’s fast, secure, and rated 4.7 stars on Trustpilot. It takes minutes to check, and it costs you nothing.
See if you're overpaying — free, 5 minutes
Quick gut-check — if your money advice is coming from random online influencers, you’re playing a dangerous game. I’ve been a CPA since 1981 and writing about money since before the internet existed. Sign up for the free Money Talks Newsletter and get expert advice that’s been tested by time.
3. $100,000 means nothing until you know your number
Here’s the deeper flaw: there’s no such thing as a universal retirement number. O’Leary’s $100,000 assumes your life looks like the average — and yours doesn’t.
Your real target depends on your income, your cost of living, your debt, when you plan to stop working, and what you’ll actually spend once you do. Two people the same age can need wildly different amounts. A single figure from a TV segment can’t know any of that.
This is where a good advisor earns their fee — running your numbers instead of a celebrity’s.
Once you achieve that magic balance, get a second set of eyes. One Vanguard study shows DIY investors turn $500K into $1.7 million over 25 years – while those with advisors reach $3.4 million. You could be missing half your potential wealth.
Finding the right advisor is simple enough. Services like SmartAsset instantly match you with up to three fiduciary advisors – legally required to prioritize your interests. They can spot tax savings, Social Security strategies, and planning gaps you’d never see alone.
$100K+ in investments? Get matched free in minutes.
4. Chasing a number fast is how people blow up the compounding
Here’s the cruel irony. When people fixate on hitting a big number by a deadline, they get impatient — and impatience is expensive. They reach for the meme stock, the crypto moonshot, the “double it quick” bet.
I’ve watched this in every market since the 1980s. The people who tried to sprint to their number are the ones who blew up the very compounding O’Leary was right to praise.
Boring and automatic beats heroic and reckless every single time. The tortoise doesn’t just win this race — the hare usually doesn’t finish it.
5. The first $100,000 is real — but 33 isn’t a finish line
I’ll give O’Leary one more point: the first $100,000 genuinely is the hardest, and it matters. Compounding gets noticeably more powerful once you’re past it. Warren Buffets friend and partner, Charlie Munger, wasn’t kidding when he called it the toughest milestone.
But O’Leary frames 33 as pass-fail, and that’s just wrong. For most people, the heavy-saving years come later — after the entry-level salary, after the student loans, after the daycare bills. That’s how the median 55-to-64-year-old reaches $185,000 (3), mostly built after 40.
And don’t assume the government fills any gap — Social Security’s main trust fund is projected to cover only about 78% of scheduled benefits after 2032 (5). Missing $100,000 at 33 isn’t failure. Quitting is. Keep the engine running.
The bottom line
O’Leary isn’t wrong to want you saving early and aggressively. He’s wrong to turn it into a line you either clear or don’t by some arbitrary birthday. That framing has talked more people out of investing than it’s ever talked into it.
The number that matters was never his. It’s yours — built from your life, your costs, and your timeline, at a pace you can actually keep. And the only move that truly wrecks a retirement is deciding you’re too far behind to bother.
So ignore the scoreboard and start the engine, wherever you are. Because you can either look rich or be rich, but you probably won’t live long enough to do both.
Sources: AOL/GOBankingRates (1); TheStreet (2); TheStreet (3); AOL/Benzinga (4); AOL (5).
Add a Comment