Bill Gates published an essay Aug. 26 warning that artificial intelligence is about to upend the working world. Nearly every outlet that covered it led with the same angle: jobs.
His language wasn’t hedged. “The transition to this new AI era will be one of the most turbulent times in human history,” Gates wrote. He also said flatly, “There is no plan to ease the entry into the AI era.”
Now pair that with a survey almost nobody put beside it. The Pew Research Center asked Americans in June whether AI leaves them more concerned than excited. Overall, 52% said more concerned.
Here’s the number that got buried. Among adults 65 and older, it was 59% — the most worried age group in America. That’s higher than the 18-to-29 crowd, who came in at 55%.
Read those two things together and something doesn’t fit. Gates is warning about jobs. Retirees don’t have jobs.
So either the most AI-anxious people in this country are afraid of nothing, or they’re afraid of the right thing for the wrong reason.
I’ve been a CPA since 1981 and spent a decade on Wall Street. After 45 years of watching what actually drains retirement money, I’ll tell you it’s the second one.
The threat to a 68-year-old isn’t a pink slip. It’s these six things, and most of them are already underway.
1. Your index fund quietly turned into a bet on AI
You’ve been told for decades to buy a low-cost S&P 500 index fund and leave it alone. That’s good advice. I’ve given it myself plenty of times.
But the index you own isn’t the one you bought.
The 10 largest stocks now account for roughly 41% of the entire S&P 500, according to J.P. Morgan Asset Management. At the height of the dot-com bubble, the top 10 made up about 27%.
Concentration today is worse than it was in 1999, and the companies doing the concentrating are almost all AI bets.
So if you’re retired and holding “just an index fund,” you aren’t as diversified as you think you are.
Here’s the fix nobody mentions. You don’t have to give up indexing. You just have to notice there’s more than one way to build an index.
A cap-weighted fund — the standard S&P 500 fund nearly everyone owns — sizes each holding by how big the company is. The bigger a stock gets, the more of it you own. That’s the machinery producing your concentration problem.
The S&P 500 Equal Weight Index does the opposite. Same 500 companies, but each gets about 0.2%, reset every quarter. Nvidia counts the same as a mid-sized insurance company.
You should know, however, that equal weight has trailed the standard index through most of the AI run-up. When a handful of giants do all the winning, owning the other 490 at the same size holds you back.
It costs more, too — think a few tenths of a percent versus a few hundredths. And it trades more, which matters if you hold it in a taxable account.
But watch what happens when the big names break. In the 2022 bear market, the equal weight index beat the standard S&P 500 by roughly 7 percentage points, according to S&P Dow Jones Indices.
That’s the trade. Less upside if the AI story keeps working. Less damage if it doesn’t.
For a 45-year-old, that’s a debatable swap. For someone pulling a monthly check out of the account, it’s a lot less debatable.
I’m not telling you to dump your index fund. I’m telling you that splitting the difference — part cap-weighted, part equal-weighted — is one of the few ways to stay invested without betting your retirement on a handful of companies.
2. The market doesn’t care about your timeline — but your withdrawals do
A 35-year-old who watches his portfolio drop 40% is annoyed. A 70-year-old pulling $4,000 a month out of that same portfolio is in genuine trouble.
Why? Because he’s selling shares into the decline to pay the light bill. Every dollar he takes out near the bottom is a dollar that never gets to recover.
Advisers call this sequence-of-returns risk, and the danger window runs roughly five years on either side of your last paycheck — what Morningstar calls the “red zone.”
I call it the thing that quietly ruins more retirements than any bad stock pick ever did.
I was a stockbroker on Black Monday in October 1987. I watched clients learn this lesson in real time. Then I watched it happen all over again.
After the dot-com crash, the Nasdaq didn’t set a new record until April 2015 — 15 years later. Someone who was 70 in 2000 turned 85 waiting for that.
Nobody knows whether AI stocks are a bubble. But if you’re drawing income from a portfolio that’s 40% concentrated in them, you don’t need to know. You just need to not be standing there.
3. AI is already on your electric bill
Data centers consume staggering amounts of power, and someone has to pay to build the capacity that feeds them. More and more, that someone is you.
In the most recent PJM grid auction, roughly $6.3 billion of $16.4 billion in capacity charges traced directly to data center demand, Fortune reported. PJM serves about 67 million people.
Consulting firm ICF projects rates across that territory — 13 states plus Washington, D.C. — could rise as much as 60% over the next five years.
If you’re still working, a fatter power bill is irritating. If you’re on a fixed income, it comes directly out of the grocery budget. Nobody’s handing you a raise to cover it.
In fairness, data centers aren’t the whole story. An aging grid infrastructure was pushing rates higher before most people had heard of ChatGPT, as I explained in “7 Hard Truths About Data Centers and Your Skyrocketing Electric Bill.”
Quick gut-check — if your money advice is coming from random online influencers, you’re playing a dangerous game. I’ve been a CPA since 1981 and writing about money since before the internet existed. Sign up for the free Money Talks Newsletter and get expert advice that’s been tested by time.
4. The crooks just got a massive upgrade
Gates flagged this risk himself. AI hands ordinary criminals capabilities that used to require real skill and real money.
They’re using them. Fraud losses reported to the Federal Trade Commission by people 60 and older climbed from about $600 million in 2020 to $2.4 billion in 2024. Tech support scams alone accounted for $159 million.
Voice cloning is the part that ought to bother you most. A few seconds of a grandchild’s audio from social media is enough to manufacture a panicked call begging for bail money.
Which means the old advice is now exactly backward. Hearing a voice you recognize proves nothing at all.
Pick a family code word this week and make sure everyone knows it. Then read up on the other tricks in “Watch Out for These 6 Increasingly Common AI Scams.”
5. A machine may be deciding what care you get
Here’s one Gates didn’t mention, and it lands squarely on people over 65.
A 2024 investigation by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations found that the three largest Medicare Advantage insurers denied post-acute care — think rehab and skilled nursing after a hospital stay — while leaning on predictive software to make those calls.
Translation: An algorithm may be deciding when you’re done healing.
If you’re in a Medicare Advantage plan, this isn’t theoretical. Take it seriously during open enrollment, which runs Oct. 15 through Dec. 7 at medicare.gov, and read “Report: Some Medicare Plans Deny Valid Requests for Care” before you renew.
6. Your kids and grandkids may land in your lap
This is where Gates’ jobs warning finally reaches your budget — through your family.
He argued that entry-level desk jobs go first. Customer support. Junior coding work. The exact rungs young people use to climb.
Not everyone buys that. Nvidia’s CEO insists AI creates more work than it destroys, and I laid out five things he’s missing earlier this month.
It’s already visible. The New York Fed reported that recent college graduates were running about a 5.6% unemployment rate in the second quarter of 2026, with 42% underemployed.
Now add what parents were already doing. Pew found that 59% of parents with kids ages 18 to 34 gave them money in the past year.
Of those who helped, 36% said it hurt their own finances. That was before AI started eating the entry-level job market.
I’m not telling you to cut your kids off. I’m telling you to decide in advance what you can afford, because “whatever they need” isn’t a number.
There’s also a middle path most parents skip, which I covered in “6 Ways to Help Adult Children Without Going Broke.”
Gates is right about one thing
There is no plan. Not from Washington, not from the companies building this stuff, and certainly not from the people selling you AI-themed mutual funds.
So write your own. It doesn’t take much.
Look at what your portfolio actually holds, not what the fund is called. Ask whether some of it belongs in an equal-weight fund instead. Keep a couple years of withdrawals somewhere that can’t drop 40%.
Create a code word to insure against fraud. Read your Medicare plan before open enrollment closes. Decide what you’ll do for the kids before they ask.
None of that requires predicting what AI does next. That’s the whole point.
The retirees telling Pew they’re worried aren’t being paranoid. They’re just aiming at the wrong target — and the real ones are already in the room.
Add a Comment